Where is the outrage?
Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader, Dick Reid have crossed the accepted political line with no apparent negative consequences. They have raised some serious questions about their ulterior motives in their recent actions undermining our Constitution.
Recently, Pelosi traveled to Syria to meet with their president against the expressed wishes and orders from the White House. Arrogant beyond comprehension, she ignored President Bush's concerns and went anyway. It is abundantly clear to most rational thinking Americans that we as a nation, must present a united front against terrorism and countries that facilitate their terrorists acts as well as their insane ideologies. President Bush has made it exceedingly clear to the leaders of Iraq, Iran and Syrian exactly where our country stands and what our foreign policy is. Any attempt by the Speaker of the House to misrepresent the President's foreign policies or to present a contrary view is tantamount to treason.
Where is the outrage? First of all, Congress is so busy holding the US Attorney General's feet to the fire over the White House firing of eight district attorneys that Pelosi's mission to Syria has gone under the radar. Gonzales is so busy defending himself that he hasn't found the time or is intimidated by the Democrats to hold Pelosi accountable for her damaging actions. She should be immediately indicted and sworn in under oath to respond to the following questions:
1. Did she make any promises to the Syrian President that compromises our American soldiers in Iraq? For example, if Pelosi conveyed to the Syrian President that American troops are coming home soon regardless of President Bush's existing policy (now that the Democrats control Congress), this could easily be construed as an act of treason, if her misrepresentation actually strengthens the resolve of the insurgents in Iraq. American soldier's lives are at stake.
2. What promises did she make to the Syrian President that in any way contradict the White House's foreign policies?
3. As Speaker of the House, is there a premeditated plan on her part or the part of a group of Democrats, to willfully attempt to unseat both the the President and Vice President of the United States by the following illegal actions? (Speaker of the House in next in line for the presidency if both the Vice President and President are forced to leave office)
a) Was it part of the premeditated plan (coup) to indict Scooter Libby for outing a CIA operative, knowing full well he was innocent, hopefully leading to the indictment and impeachment of the Vice President, then the President?
b) Was it part of the premeditated plan (coup) to indict US Attorney General Gonzales for firing the eight district attorneys even though it was within the White House's powers to do so, thus weakening the power of the attorney general while attempting the coup?
c) Will both Pelosi and Reid turn over all related correspondence by way of emails and written materials to the US attorney general's office?
Also, Dick Reid made a dangerous statement recently in his press conference declaring that America has lost the war in Iraq. This insidiously statement could potentially be more harmful to the courageous efforts on the behalf of our military in Iraq then all of the enemy's bombs combined. The insurgents in Iraq will definitely draw strength from his statements that will surely lead to the loss of more American soldier's lives.
Again, where is the outrage?
Friday, April 20, 2007
Thursday, April 12, 2007
Barack Obama... Can he Unite Our Divided Country?
April, 2007
Perhaps I should take another serious look at voting for Barack Obama for president in the upcomming national election. For anybody out there who know me or have read my blogs know full well that I lean full tilt to the right in my most of my ideologies.
One of my concerns about voting for Barack is, if he becomes our next president, will he represent all American citizens, not just Afro Americans? Will he be so beholding to Al Sharpton and Jessie Jackson to cement the Black vote, that the rest of the citizens will not get the same fair consideration is our needs and rights? First of all, who elected Al Sharpton and Jessie Jackson as the proprietor of moral conscious on any issue, especially with their racially divisive backgrounds.
I admit, I've written animadversions about Obama's associations with these before mentioned civil rights leaders. We need our next president to unite all of us as a country and to make important future policies that represent all Americans. Is there one single breathing sole alive that believe that either Jessie Jackson or Al Sharpton represents any cause that isn't racially divisive and furthers their own personal agendas?
One case in point: Imus is embroiled in the media and rightfully so, about his racially offensive comments about Rutger's women's basketball team. Both Jackson and Sharpton have led the charge to pressure MS NBC and corporate sponsors to fire Imus from his TV show which was accomplished. I too believe his remarks were damaging to these Innocent female college students and should have been fired because of it and a history of crude, hateful demonizing rhetoric in the past. Good riddance Imus. But, should these two historically biased, racially divisive civil rights leaders guide, lead, influence, control, and persuade Obama's personal moral compass as our next acting president? I think not.
It's obvious to even the mentally challenged that both Jackson and Sharpton seek racially minded issues that advance their causes. In New York city alone, 70% of all crime is committed by the 24% of Afro Americans in that city. Where is the outrage? Where are Jackson and Sharpton in working with the community to put a dent into these disturbing figures that concern Blacks? They are too busy getting Imus fired for one racist comment while fellow Blacks are being killed daily in New York city.
Our country is so divided between the two parties on almost every pertinent national and current events issue facing our great nation. This inquietude is shared by many of us with no foreseeable salvation in sight.
It's too difficult to digest at times the intensity of the inimical attitude Democrats take towards anything that remotely represents, American patriotism, the war in Iraq, how we education our children, controlling immigration, how we grow our economy, taxation, religion... you get my point. We are from one country, yet our ideologies are vastly different.
Perhaps, if Obama can learn to stand on his own two political feet and represent all Americans, he might be the political savior we have all been searching for. I actually believe he's sincere in his attempt to be the uniter we've all be searching for. He doesn't spew hatred, but instead speaks from his heart in a pleasing, gentle tone on all issues which is admirable, drawing in larger crowds in his speeches than any of his counterparts for the presidency in either party.
At this point, Barack Obama has my vote. Our country will implode from within if something isn't done to remedy the ongoing epidemic in politics. I like his approach to settling the immigration problem. He has said that he believes that the Mexican border has to better monitored, that illegal immigrants should have to earn their citizenship in some fashion, learn to speak English, and go back of the line to become American citizens. Obama also believes that America doesn't have the resources to send all of them back to Mexico. I agree. Let's try it his way; nothing is working now.
Okay Obama, let's see if you can keep my vote until the election next year, or will you fall back in submission to Jackson's and Sharpton's control which I sadly fear?
Perhaps I should take another serious look at voting for Barack Obama for president in the upcomming national election. For anybody out there who know me or have read my blogs know full well that I lean full tilt to the right in my most of my ideologies.
One of my concerns about voting for Barack is, if he becomes our next president, will he represent all American citizens, not just Afro Americans? Will he be so beholding to Al Sharpton and Jessie Jackson to cement the Black vote, that the rest of the citizens will not get the same fair consideration is our needs and rights? First of all, who elected Al Sharpton and Jessie Jackson as the proprietor of moral conscious on any issue, especially with their racially divisive backgrounds.
I admit, I've written animadversions about Obama's associations with these before mentioned civil rights leaders. We need our next president to unite all of us as a country and to make important future policies that represent all Americans. Is there one single breathing sole alive that believe that either Jessie Jackson or Al Sharpton represents any cause that isn't racially divisive and furthers their own personal agendas?
One case in point: Imus is embroiled in the media and rightfully so, about his racially offensive comments about Rutger's women's basketball team. Both Jackson and Sharpton have led the charge to pressure MS NBC and corporate sponsors to fire Imus from his TV show which was accomplished. I too believe his remarks were damaging to these Innocent female college students and should have been fired because of it and a history of crude, hateful demonizing rhetoric in the past. Good riddance Imus. But, should these two historically biased, racially divisive civil rights leaders guide, lead, influence, control, and persuade Obama's personal moral compass as our next acting president? I think not.
It's obvious to even the mentally challenged that both Jackson and Sharpton seek racially minded issues that advance their causes. In New York city alone, 70% of all crime is committed by the 24% of Afro Americans in that city. Where is the outrage? Where are Jackson and Sharpton in working with the community to put a dent into these disturbing figures that concern Blacks? They are too busy getting Imus fired for one racist comment while fellow Blacks are being killed daily in New York city.
Our country is so divided between the two parties on almost every pertinent national and current events issue facing our great nation. This inquietude is shared by many of us with no foreseeable salvation in sight.
It's too difficult to digest at times the intensity of the inimical attitude Democrats take towards anything that remotely represents, American patriotism, the war in Iraq, how we education our children, controlling immigration, how we grow our economy, taxation, religion... you get my point. We are from one country, yet our ideologies are vastly different.
Perhaps, if Obama can learn to stand on his own two political feet and represent all Americans, he might be the political savior we have all been searching for. I actually believe he's sincere in his attempt to be the uniter we've all be searching for. He doesn't spew hatred, but instead speaks from his heart in a pleasing, gentle tone on all issues which is admirable, drawing in larger crowds in his speeches than any of his counterparts for the presidency in either party.
At this point, Barack Obama has my vote. Our country will implode from within if something isn't done to remedy the ongoing epidemic in politics. I like his approach to settling the immigration problem. He has said that he believes that the Mexican border has to better monitored, that illegal immigrants should have to earn their citizenship in some fashion, learn to speak English, and go back of the line to become American citizens. Obama also believes that America doesn't have the resources to send all of them back to Mexico. I agree. Let's try it his way; nothing is working now.
Okay Obama, let's see if you can keep my vote until the election next year, or will you fall back in submission to Jackson's and Sharpton's control which I sadly fear?
Wednesday, April 11, 2007
The Democratic Congress Has Gone Amok
April, 2007
The controlling Democratic Congress has taken control of the US government and are now running amok. By their insidious actions, they have done everything within their power to enfeeble our country to its bloody core.
It's extremely obvious to many of us that the Democrat's consuming, immutable hatred towards the president and his Republican administration outweigh any patriotic feelings they once had for their country. Their plan of action is to retake the presidency at any cost. Good news in any fashion for our country under the Bush administration is viewed as a negative by the liberal left. Take low employment rates, a growing healthy economy, daily successes in Iraq and yet, the biased press and left minded politicians inveigh all of these successes.
Even many of their own constituents of the Democratic party are confused by their own party's enigmatic policy of aligning with illegal immigrant's efforts to remain in this country. It's quite obvious that the Democrat's underlying objective is to quickly initiate new laws allowing these illegal immigrants from Mexico the right of suffrage, in their favor, of course. The ends justify the means at any cost to unseat the Republicans.
There is no concern from the Democrat's perspective because their strategy is to simply pay for all the additional costs by raising taxes on the middle and upper classes. There's no need to worry on their part about straining our economy as we struggle to educate, house, and medically treat every illegal in our country. Our schools are breaking at the seams with the overcrowding of illegal immigrant's children, emergency rooms are backed up for hours before those who are sick or injured can be seen with the influx of illegal patients, doctors are delivering illegal immigrant babies by the thousands, and so forth, but the main point I'm trying to make is that this is but a small price to pay to enjoin the illegal vote on their side. With the consistent backing of 90% of all Afro Americans and about 95% of illegal Mexicans added to their left wing votes, the Democrats could potentially stay in office for a long time; that's all that matters.
President Bush just recently released his new and improved immigration policy that requires all illegal immigrants to return to Mexico, pay a ten thousand dollar fine and then wait in line to legally return to the US. Why even propose a plan with a 100% of failure? Who is giving this man advice?
First, I sympathize compassionately with the Mexicans migrating to our country to provide a better life for their families. Most Mexicans are hard working, caring people that should be given some realistic chance of becoming US citizens. How about illegals serving time in our military for a minimum of two to four years, helping us overseas where armed forces are needed or serving some type of community service to earn citizenship? How is is that I can think of this, but Congress can't?
Conversely, I'm increasingly despondent over the fact that the executive office, more specifically, President Bush, has refused to counter the Democrat's efforts to undue over 200 years of democracy. The Democrats have developed a new stratagem of not just demonizing their Congress counterparts as in the past, but are now attempting to criminalize those that disagree with their ideologies, take Scooter Libby as an example.
Scooter Libby successfully was entrapped by a liberal Federal attorney who indicted him for allegedly outing a CIA operative. They spent four years going after Scooter Libby, an aid to the Vice President in hopes of making a direct bee line to the president's head . Even after the prosecuting attorney found out that Libby was totally innocent of the original charge, he still went after him. They eventually found a jury to convict Libby on not being able to remember every single detail in hundreds of conversations over the last four years, therefore in their estimation, lying under oath. Libby can potentially serve 25 years in a Federal prison for a crime he didn't commit. Not one word out of Bush's mouth in his defense.
Now, they are going after the US Attorney General, Gonzalez in the same fashion. The president had the right to fire eight judicial judges, but the Democrat controlled Congress is indicting the Attorney General in hope of catching him in some type of lie under oath. It's a brilliant plan of action on the Democrat's twisted side worthy of the Nazi, Gerble himself. Mark my words, they will not quit there. Who will they go after next, you and I?
Bush's nugatory time remaining in office is consumed with his efforts of continuing his war in Iraq. I blame him for not standing up to these illiberal minded Democrats with the same intensity he defends the war. How about indicting Speaker of the House, Pelosi for meeting with the Syrians which is strictly forbidden by law. Your propitious attitude towards those who mean you serious harm, including jail time is quite disconcerting to me. In other words, Mr. President, it's time to stand up and fight for all of our causes, not just the war effort; our country's future depends on it.
The controlling Democratic Congress has taken control of the US government and are now running amok. By their insidious actions, they have done everything within their power to enfeeble our country to its bloody core.
It's extremely obvious to many of us that the Democrat's consuming, immutable hatred towards the president and his Republican administration outweigh any patriotic feelings they once had for their country. Their plan of action is to retake the presidency at any cost. Good news in any fashion for our country under the Bush administration is viewed as a negative by the liberal left. Take low employment rates, a growing healthy economy, daily successes in Iraq and yet, the biased press and left minded politicians inveigh all of these successes.
Even many of their own constituents of the Democratic party are confused by their own party's enigmatic policy of aligning with illegal immigrant's efforts to remain in this country. It's quite obvious that the Democrat's underlying objective is to quickly initiate new laws allowing these illegal immigrants from Mexico the right of suffrage, in their favor, of course. The ends justify the means at any cost to unseat the Republicans.
There is no concern from the Democrat's perspective because their strategy is to simply pay for all the additional costs by raising taxes on the middle and upper classes. There's no need to worry on their part about straining our economy as we struggle to educate, house, and medically treat every illegal in our country. Our schools are breaking at the seams with the overcrowding of illegal immigrant's children, emergency rooms are backed up for hours before those who are sick or injured can be seen with the influx of illegal patients, doctors are delivering illegal immigrant babies by the thousands, and so forth, but the main point I'm trying to make is that this is but a small price to pay to enjoin the illegal vote on their side. With the consistent backing of 90% of all Afro Americans and about 95% of illegal Mexicans added to their left wing votes, the Democrats could potentially stay in office for a long time; that's all that matters.
President Bush just recently released his new and improved immigration policy that requires all illegal immigrants to return to Mexico, pay a ten thousand dollar fine and then wait in line to legally return to the US. Why even propose a plan with a 100% of failure? Who is giving this man advice?
First, I sympathize compassionately with the Mexicans migrating to our country to provide a better life for their families. Most Mexicans are hard working, caring people that should be given some realistic chance of becoming US citizens. How about illegals serving time in our military for a minimum of two to four years, helping us overseas where armed forces are needed or serving some type of community service to earn citizenship? How is is that I can think of this, but Congress can't?
Conversely, I'm increasingly despondent over the fact that the executive office, more specifically, President Bush, has refused to counter the Democrat's efforts to undue over 200 years of democracy. The Democrats have developed a new stratagem of not just demonizing their Congress counterparts as in the past, but are now attempting to criminalize those that disagree with their ideologies, take Scooter Libby as an example.
Scooter Libby successfully was entrapped by a liberal Federal attorney who indicted him for allegedly outing a CIA operative. They spent four years going after Scooter Libby, an aid to the Vice President in hopes of making a direct bee line to the president's head . Even after the prosecuting attorney found out that Libby was totally innocent of the original charge, he still went after him. They eventually found a jury to convict Libby on not being able to remember every single detail in hundreds of conversations over the last four years, therefore in their estimation, lying under oath. Libby can potentially serve 25 years in a Federal prison for a crime he didn't commit. Not one word out of Bush's mouth in his defense.
Now, they are going after the US Attorney General, Gonzalez in the same fashion. The president had the right to fire eight judicial judges, but the Democrat controlled Congress is indicting the Attorney General in hope of catching him in some type of lie under oath. It's a brilliant plan of action on the Democrat's twisted side worthy of the Nazi, Gerble himself. Mark my words, they will not quit there. Who will they go after next, you and I?
Bush's nugatory time remaining in office is consumed with his efforts of continuing his war in Iraq. I blame him for not standing up to these illiberal minded Democrats with the same intensity he defends the war. How about indicting Speaker of the House, Pelosi for meeting with the Syrians which is strictly forbidden by law. Your propitious attitude towards those who mean you serious harm, including jail time is quite disconcerting to me. In other words, Mr. President, it's time to stand up and fight for all of our causes, not just the war effort; our country's future depends on it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
