Wednesday, September 26, 2007

The Left is Distraught over America's Image Abroad!

The Liberals are distraught over how American is viewed by the rest of the world in light of the War in Iraq.

Their daily mantra on TV and radio shows claims that President Bush has hurt, damaged our image around the world… what a bunch of horse manure.

Consider these observations:

· How many rafts jammed full of refugees have been reported fleeing the shores of America lately… if ever? The answer is… zip, nada, none.
· Remember, America is building a wall on the Mexican border to keep illegal immigrants from coming into our country, not from keeping our citizens locked in. There are over 15 million illegal immigrants on American soil taking advantage of the American Democratic way of life. Here they enjoy freedom of speech, basic human rights, allowed to make high wages at work, are given free medical care, free education and much more. Do all of these people hate America as well? If so, why are they still here?
· A majority of the track and field athletics competing at the world track games representing countries all over the world actually are schooled and trained at our own universities. America should receive a special award for training the all African Team. Do all of these athletes getting a free ride at our universities hate us as well?
· America is the largest contributor in foreign aid around the world; food, water, hard cash, human resources, doctors, nurses, etc. Do all of these countries who have received all of our tremendous charity hate us? Who is the first country they seek out for foreign aid after a Hurricane, earthquake, cataclysmic event, etc?

Like him or hate him, the president has a greater responsibility to his own citizens than wining the “most beloved country” prize in the world. His hands-on leadership have kept our county safe since 9/11 and of course, he’s been given no credit from the left at all. The success has come from hard found intelligence discovered by the NSA, working under the lawful guidelines of the Patriot Act that every Liberal politician wants to revoke. If our county is safe, it’s bad news for the left.

Donald Trump was on the Fox Morning show recently talking about why Bush is the worst president ever. Reason number one – he has personally ruined our image around the world. Bull! How does that affect anyone’s life here in America what other people think anyway? Can you not enjoy your petty life because some people in Iran don’t like you as an America? More biased liberal media against the right. Take a note, when our country is engaged in a war against fundamental Islamic terrorist bent on eradicating democracy off the face of the planet, some people are going to be upset.

And yet, the liberal politicians such as Chris Dodd, Clinton, and a good many others on the left actually brag, cheer and fight for the rights of who… the detainees in Abu-Graf, or Guantanamo, not our own soldiers. What about improving the living conditions of jailed inmates in their own state prisons? Their left wing representatives are more concerned that the Islamic fanatical prisoners, some who have been imprisoned for cutting off the heads of American soldiers, indeed get better treatment than their own American citizens locked away in American prisons.

Here is a fact that I read in another editorial. The obvious reason most countries have a negative view of Americans in general is because they think American’s are completely spoiled and have no appreciation for all the wonderful things they should be thankful for.

Here is a suggestion for those who are locked in goose steps on the left. Count your daily blessings and quit all of your whining and crying. Try living some time in Syria, Iran, Somalia or North Korea. Complain there and you forfeit you life. I guarantee that you will return to the states with a much better attitude about all of the wonderful things America has to offer.

Yea, right!

Tuesday, September 18, 2007

Kucinich Commits Treason

Dennis Kucinich, the diminutive representative from Ohio has committed our nation’s worst and unforgiveable crime; treason against his own country. He recently journeyed to Syria for a national interview on Syrian TV. In this interview Kucinich proceeded to denounce our president, our war in Iraq and spoke about how wonderful their own president was. Syria is guilty of training insurgents as well as providing sophisticated weaponry to those killing American soldiers in Iraq. This is not conjecture, but based on facts and for an American Congressman to embolden our enemy in a time of war by his words and actions constitutes treason.

I propose that the U.S. Attorney General move to indict Kucinich on charges of treason, try him then give him two choices. One, imprisonment or two, invoke his U.S. passport and allow him to live in Syria he spoke so highly of. Instead he is praised by the left and again the right’s passivity towards their counterparts goes unchecked.

After further examining Kucinich’s voting record in Congress, it makes it crystal clear the glaring differences between the political parties. Here are but 25 examples of how Kucinich voted representing Ohio in Congress. I could have listed 100 more if needed, but I believe I’ve illustrated my point effectively on the glaring, dramatic differences between the two political parties.

Enjoy reading the following if you’re liberal. If conservative, be afraid, very afraid of where our country is headed if Kucinich is elected president.

1. He voted against the Patriot Act.
2. Voted against the war in Iraq.
3. Voted against funding the war.
4. Supports legal status for illegal immigrants in America.
5. Votes against privatizing social security.
6. Voted against Bush tax cuts.
7. He voted on needing a separation between Corporations and State – (Communism)
8. He voted on alternative funding instead of new prisons.
9. Voted against constitutionally defining a marriage as “one man and one woman.”
10. Voting against the Pledge of Allegiance.
11. Voting for preferential treatment for race in college admissions.
12. Voted for the ACLU 64% of the time.
13. Thinks abortions should be illegal at all stages.
14. Supports reparations for Slavery.
15. He’s for Affirmative Action – a code name for apartheid as in South Africa’s past.
16. Voted no on Military borders patrols to battle drugs and terrorism.
17. Voted no on allowing prayer in school during the war in Iraq.
18. Voted no on allowing vouchers for students in DC.
19. Opposes allowing school prayer.
20. Voted no on establishing a national wide AMBER alert for missing children.
21. Supports same sex marriage.
22. Voted no on reforming the United Nations by restricting U.S. funding.
23. He wants to end privatization.
24. Voted no on building a fence on the Mexican border.
25. Supports raising taxes.

As for myself I truly hope Kucinich continues to hate American and decides he can’t take it any more and decides to move to Syria.

Friday, September 14, 2007

History Repeats Itself

Democratic Hypocrisy Runs Amuck!

History repeats itself once again. Those who don’t pay attention to history are inclined to repeat it, as the saying goes.

First of all, it’s illegal for any foreign country, especially those with a communist form of government such as China to contribute to U.S. presidential campaigns. This rule of law did not apply to the Clinton-Gore campaign in 1996 or now to Hillary’s campaign in 2007.

One of the greatest frustrations for conservatives during the Bill Clinton-Al Gore presidential campaign in 1996 was the reluctance or refusal of the US Attorney General Janet Reno to enforce the FEC campaign contribution laws. Republicans supplicated themselves to Reno to represent all Americans not just the President. Does this sound familiar to anyone?

It resulted in 120 Chinese contributors to Bill Clinton’s campaign illegally donating money - most of them evading prosecution by conveniently escaping from the U.S. just in the nick of time. When the dusk settled over the illegal foreign campaign irregularities, 22 Democrat donors were convicted in the Chinagate probe, the rest got away without Reno pursuing their arrest.

During the Clinton campaign of 1996, the People’s Liberation Army launched a massive campaign to buy influence in the Democratic Party that would guide military hardware and technology Beijing’s way. Reports by federal investigators discovered that the PLA used Chinese agents, spies living in the U.S. as bagmen to funnel cash to the Clinton-Gore campaigns and gain immediate access to the White House and sensitive government agencies.

In 1998, in the course of plea bargaining with the Justice Department, a Chinese bagman named Johnny Chung confessed that at least $100,000 of his contributions to the DNC and the Clinton-Gore Campaign had indeed come from a Chinese aerospace executive – who have given him $300,000. This same person happened to also be the daughter of the PLA’s top general and a key member of China’s Communist Party. Chung told prosecutors that the $300,000 had been ordered into his bank account by the head of the Chinese military intelligence.

During the 1996 campaign, Chung was a regular White House visitor. He visited the White House 57 times and during one visit even handed Hillary Clinton’s chief of Staff a check of $50,000. Three days earlier, he had received a $150,000 wire transfer from the Bank of China.
For you left wing conspiracy theory nuts out there, all of the above information is factual and documented; a far cry from the Bush conspiracy theories floating around today that Bush had his Nazi like civil engineers destroy the levies to kill poor Blacks during Katrina or that Bush was behind 9/11. No, what I’m saying is actual documented facts with photos of Chung with the Clintons at the White House together as proof.

Here’s another example of corruption in the Democratic Party. Most alarmingly, Schwartz persuaded the Clinton administration to give his Loral Space and Communications subsidiary a waiver to use inexpensive Chinese rockets to launch U.S. satellites into space. Loral at the same time helped Beijing – over the objections of the U.S. intelligence community – improve its commercial space launchers. That in turn, helped make its nuclear-tipped missiles more reliable as ICBMs, several of which are aimed at U.S. cities. Schwartz, who was Clinton's top donor in the 1996 election cycle, insists his contributions did not buy policy changes regarding China. He says the favorable treatment he got from the administration was merely a "coincidence."

Where was the outrage? Suppressed, is the answer. Attorney General Reno and her cohorts, the complicit liberal press successfully protected their president. The Democratic Party and liberal press again sacrificed national security in favor of keeping their side in office. Today the liberal press has all but expunged the memory of Chinagate, but fortunately for all Americans, talk radio has kept the memory alive. Thank God for Rush Limbaugh, Laura Ingram and others as gate keepers of the real truth.

Everyone forgets that the illegal Chinese campaign funds in the 90’s were also used to finance TV adds to attack Newt Gingrich, Speaker of the House by the DNC, spearheaded by Bonner. Close to 100 absurd, nugatory charges were brought against him. One of the charges brought against Gingrich illustrates the mindset of Bonner. Gingrich taught a two week history course at the University of Georgia on American history. Bonner brought charges against him he for politicizing his course with Republican doctrine. What? I watched the entire course telecasted on PBS. Gingrich lectured on American history and how our great forefathers made incredible sacrifices in order to build our great nation. To the left wing, that philosophy of saluting our American heroes is insidious to their way of thinking. I wanted to scream when I heard the ridiculous charges made against him and of course the charges were found baseless. The only offense out of 100 charges they could find fault with Gingrich was for receiving funds for a book he was writing while still holding office. He was forced to resign and the Republican Party has never been the same without his brilliant leadership.

2007 Democratic Campaign

Now, the 2007 presidential campaign is in full tilt and history is repeating itself once again. It’s now reported that a corrupt Chinese donor to Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign has close ties to an aerospace mogul accused of placing his business interest before national security by sharing missile secrets with Beijing during the Clinton administration. Native Hong Kong, Chinese-American businessman Hsu has contributed to Democratic campaigns including close to one million to Hillary Clinton’s campaign. The problem for the Democrats is that Hsu recently turned himself in on fraud charges, skipped bail and then was captured on a train in Colorado.
Now we find out the Hsu’s various American based companies listed on federal campaign filing with the FEC no longer exist, and indeed might be fictitious. Is anyone shocked by this? Hsu filed for bankruptcy last year, so it begs the question, where did he get the resources to contribute so much money?

The liberal press will not connect the dots that would normally lead any rationally thinking person to suspect that Clinton and the DNC are back to the same ole business with the way they raise funds. These illegal actions are feared to lead to foreign countries again gaining access to our military intelligence, concessions in trade agreements, etc. – Have the Chinese prospered due to the financially influencing the Democrats? Is it any wonder that China supplies over 80% of all toys sold in American stores?

Certainly there are more Hsu's out there. There needs to be a full scale investigation of all DNC contributors.

Thursday, July 26, 2007

Good News VS Bad News for America

It has become painstakingly obvious to any clear thinking individual that any type of “good news” for America under the Bush administration is considered “bad news” for Democrats. Take the good news about America’s strong economy for example. The Dow Stock Exchange recently set record highs and yet the Democrats and their brothers in arms, the liberal press, downplay it. How about the fact that the Patriot Act has protected every US citizen from another 9/11 type of attack and again the Left Wing with their liberal press accuses Bush of violating the civil rights of citizens with their NSA screening for terrorism calls coming into our country. What about my human right to live versus the civil rights of Muslims to chatter undetected from one continent to the next?

The complete and utter defeat in Iraq is the only acceptable outcome that will satisfy the Democrats on the war. The onslaught of American soldiers returning home from the war in Iraq or Afghanistan wounded or in body bags, is welcomed as good news with high-fiving among many in the left wing.

Some of the top Democratic leaders in Congress including Barak Obama and Hillary Clinton voted against continuing the military funding in Iraq so that Americans soldiers could be provided with the latest in technology in defense against the dreaded IED’s that are causing the greatest amount of deaths and wounded. Politics, getting elected President trumps any consideration for the lives of American soldiers. Even Senator Biden chided both Senators in one of the debates for their heartless, insensitive actions.

Let’s not let Senator Biden off the hook completely either. In this same You Tube” Democratic debate, Senator Biden proposed sending in 2500 hundred American troops today, right now if he was president to stop the civil war in Darfur, Africa. Of course Biden is one of the loudest voices heard on Capital Hill criticizing the White House’s policy on the war in Iraq because American is now caught in the middle of a civil war there and we should have no part of it.

The difference as I see it between most conservatives and Democrats is that most conservatives are willing to break rank with their leaders, if their leaders deviate from conservative main stream thinking. Democrats would rather fall on the sword than betray one of their own leaders regardless of how absurd their policies are.

Here are some of my own personal examples where I disagree with White House policy: Bush wanted to sign a new immigration bill that Senator Kennedy, Graham and others drew up that would have legalized 20 to 40 million immigrants in one signing of the pen. No, they wouldn’t have become instant US citizens, but still would have received all the rights and privileges of US citizens. Fortunately, talk radio and TV talk host campaigned religiously against it winning out in the end. Last year alone, over 190 billion dollars were spent on illegal aliens. We could have covered the cost of health care for every single US citizen who isn’t already covered with that money.

I'm upset with the president over his failure to move quicker in New Orleans after Katrina. I upset with the president taking the side of the Texas district attorney, Sutton over the jailing of 2 border guards for 10 and 11 years respectively. Both border guards should be immediately set free, pardoned by the president.

You see, I disagree with the White House's policies and go on record. What about the Democrats?

There is the new left wing ideology that’s been labeled “Post Modernism.” This new philosophy is a failure to see the truth or face facts that don’t correlate with their Left Wing’s feelings… emotions that fit their own beliefs and ideologies. For example, fanatical Muslims intent on killing every American, Christian or Jew are not America’s enemy with the left; instead, Bush is the enemy. Let’s not even identify them as Muslims, but non-Americans. So, who flew those planes into the Trade Center on 9/11? To the emotional left, it was President Bush who masterminded it, of course? They are completely blinded to the truth.

How about another example! Everyone knows that the levies in New Orleans broke because of Hurricane Katrina that flooded the city. No, the left’s warp minds cannot accept this truth or fact, but conjure a Left Wing’s wacko theory that Bush himself had his anti-black civil engineers destroy the levees on purpose in order to destroy the city and as an added plus, kill Afro-Americans in the process.

Apparently there is a part of the brain that shuts off thinking with common sense when emotion is involved. Compare it to “being in love." Who hasn’t been blinded by emotion when “in love” making bad decisions that you wouldn’t normally have made with a clear thinking mind? It’s the same thing for Post Modernists, the Left’s hatred for Bush or conservatives for that matter, have a traumatic effect on their brains, blinding them from seeing the truth.

Let’s put the Democratic left’s way of thinking into proper perspective. Here are some examples to illustrate the Democratic Party's impact on America’s future.
1. A left wing judge let a Libyan child molester go free because they couldn’t find a court appointed interpreter from Libya. The Libyan molested two defenseless children, a 7 year-old boy and the other, only a one-year old boy. The court admitted that they couldn’t find an interpreter in the two years they searched so their hands were tied since he was entitled to a speedy trial. Here are the facts that the Post Modernist can’t see. One, an interpreter was found within one hour of searching for one... one who lived only 15 miles of the courtroom. Next, the Libyan, thug, molester, actually graduated from high school in town and could speak perfect English.
2. The left wing district attorney in North Carolina purposely indicted three innocent students from Duke charging them with raping a drug induced stripper at a frat party. Politics reared its ugly head... winning the black vote was needed if he was to win the upcoming election for district attorney. The district attorney was caught lying and suppressing evidence that would have easily freed the students. Luckily, he has been bared from practicing law ever again and perhaps will spend time in prison himself.
3. Currently, a left wing principal and the left wing district attorney from that city are attempting to prosecute a 13 year old middle school student and to send him to prison for 10 years for slapping another 8th grader on the rear.
4. Left wing administrators pardon two men from prison with over 20 robberies and other crimes on their records. These same two men broke into a house in Connecticut, raped and murdered the mother, 17 and 11 year old daughters, beat the dad unrecognizable then set the house on fire.

I could go on and on siting cases.

We must do whatever is neccessary to bring sanity back to into America.

Friday, April 20, 2007

Democrat Leadership Should Be Held in Contempt!

Where is the outrage?

Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader, Dick Reid have crossed the accepted political line with no apparent negative consequences. They have raised some serious questions about their ulterior motives in their recent actions undermining our Constitution.

Recently, Pelosi traveled to Syria to meet with their president against the expressed wishes and orders from the White House. Arrogant beyond comprehension, she ignored President Bush's concerns and went anyway. It is abundantly clear to most rational thinking Americans that we as a nation, must present a united front against terrorism and countries that facilitate their terrorists acts as well as their insane ideologies. President Bush has made it exceedingly clear to the leaders of Iraq, Iran and Syrian exactly where our country stands and what our foreign policy is. Any attempt by the Speaker of the House to misrepresent the President's foreign policies or to present a contrary view is tantamount to treason.

Where is the outrage? First of all, Congress is so busy holding the US Attorney General's feet to the fire over the White House firing of eight district attorneys that Pelosi's mission to Syria has gone under the radar. Gonzales is so busy defending himself that he hasn't found the time or is intimidated by the Democrats to hold Pelosi accountable for her damaging actions. She should be immediately indicted and sworn in under oath to respond to the following questions:

1. Did she make any promises to the Syrian President that compromises our American soldiers in Iraq? For example, if Pelosi conveyed to the Syrian President that American troops are coming home soon regardless of President Bush's existing policy (now that the Democrats control Congress), this could easily be construed as an act of treason, if her misrepresentation actually strengthens the resolve of the insurgents in Iraq. American soldier's lives are at stake.

2. What promises did she make to the Syrian President that in any way contradict the White House's foreign policies?

3. As Speaker of the House, is there a premeditated plan on her part or the part of a group of Democrats, to willfully attempt to unseat both the the President and Vice President of the United States by the following illegal actions? (Speaker of the House in next in line for the presidency if both the Vice President and President are forced to leave office)
a) Was it part of the premeditated plan (coup) to indict Scooter Libby for outing a CIA operative, knowing full well he was innocent, hopefully leading to the indictment and impeachment of the Vice President, then the President?
b) Was it part of the premeditated plan (coup) to indict US Attorney General Gonzales for firing the eight district attorneys even though it was within the White House's powers to do so, thus weakening the power of the attorney general while attempting the coup?
c) Will both Pelosi and Reid turn over all related correspondence by way of emails and written materials to the US attorney general's office?

Also, Dick Reid made a dangerous statement recently in his press conference declaring that America has lost the war in Iraq. This insidiously statement could potentially be more harmful to the courageous efforts on the behalf of our military in Iraq then all of the enemy's bombs combined. The insurgents in Iraq will definitely draw strength from his statements that will surely lead to the loss of more American soldier's lives.

Again, where is the outrage?

Thursday, April 12, 2007

Barack Obama... Can he Unite Our Divided Country?

April, 2007

Perhaps I should take another serious look at voting for Barack Obama for president in the upcomming national election. For anybody out there who know me or have read my blogs know full well that I lean full tilt to the right in my most of my ideologies.

One of my concerns about voting for Barack is, if he becomes our next president, will he represent all American citizens, not just Afro Americans? Will he be so beholding to Al Sharpton and Jessie Jackson to cement the Black vote, that the rest of the citizens will not get the same fair consideration is our needs and rights? First of all, who elected Al Sharpton and Jessie Jackson as the proprietor of moral conscious on any issue, especially with their racially divisive backgrounds.

I admit, I've written animadversions about Obama's associations with these before mentioned civil rights leaders. We need our next president to unite all of us as a country and to make important future policies that represent all Americans. Is there one single breathing sole alive that believe that either Jessie Jackson or Al Sharpton represents any cause that isn't racially divisive and furthers their own personal agendas?

One case in point: Imus is embroiled in the media and rightfully so, about his racially offensive comments about Rutger's women's basketball team. Both Jackson and Sharpton have led the charge to pressure MS NBC and corporate sponsors to fire Imus from his TV show which was accomplished. I too believe his remarks were damaging to these Innocent female college students and should have been fired because of it and a history of crude, hateful demonizing rhetoric in the past. Good riddance Imus. But, should these two historically biased, racially divisive civil rights leaders guide, lead, influence, control, and persuade Obama's personal moral compass as our next acting president? I think not.

It's obvious to even the mentally challenged that both Jackson and Sharpton seek racially minded issues that advance their causes. In New York city alone, 70% of all crime is committed by the 24% of Afro Americans in that city. Where is the outrage? Where are Jackson and Sharpton in working with the community to put a dent into these disturbing figures that concern Blacks? They are too busy getting Imus fired for one racist comment while fellow Blacks are being killed daily in New York city.

Our country is so divided between the two parties on almost every pertinent national and current events issue facing our great nation. This inquietude is shared by many of us with no foreseeable salvation in sight.

It's too difficult to digest at times the intensity of the inimical attitude Democrats take towards anything that remotely represents, American patriotism, the war in Iraq, how we education our children, controlling immigration, how we grow our economy, taxation, religion... you get my point. We are from one country, yet our ideologies are vastly different.

Perhaps, if Obama can learn to stand on his own two political feet and represent all Americans, he might be the political savior we have all been searching for. I actually believe he's sincere in his attempt to be the uniter we've all be searching for. He doesn't spew hatred, but instead speaks from his heart in a pleasing, gentle tone on all issues which is admirable, drawing in larger crowds in his speeches than any of his counterparts for the presidency in either party.

At this point, Barack Obama has my vote. Our country will implode from within if something isn't done to remedy the ongoing epidemic in politics. I like his approach to settling the immigration problem. He has said that he believes that the Mexican border has to better monitored, that illegal immigrants should have to earn their citizenship in some fashion, learn to speak English, and go back of the line to become American citizens. Obama also believes that America doesn't have the resources to send all of them back to Mexico. I agree. Let's try it his way; nothing is working now.

Okay Obama, let's see if you can keep my vote until the election next year, or will you fall back in submission to Jackson's and Sharpton's control which I sadly fear?

Wednesday, April 11, 2007

The Democratic Congress Has Gone Amok

April, 2007
The controlling Democratic Congress has taken control of the US government and are now running amok. By their insidious actions, they have done everything within their power to enfeeble our country to its bloody core.

It's extremely obvious to many of us that the Democrat's consuming, immutable hatred towards the president and his Republican administration outweigh any patriotic feelings they once had for their country. Their plan of action is to retake the presidency at any cost. Good news in any fashion for our country under the Bush administration is viewed as a negative by the liberal left. Take low employment rates, a growing healthy economy, daily successes in Iraq and yet, the biased press and left minded politicians inveigh all of these successes.

Even many of their own constituents of the Democratic party are confused by their own party's enigmatic policy of aligning with illegal immigrant's efforts to remain in this country. It's quite obvious that the Democrat's underlying objective is to quickly initiate new laws allowing these illegal immigrants from Mexico the right of suffrage, in their favor, of course. The ends justify the means at any cost to unseat the Republicans.

There is no concern from the Democrat's perspective because their strategy is to simply pay for all the additional costs by raising taxes on the middle and upper classes. There's no need to worry on their part about straining our economy as we struggle to educate, house, and medically treat every illegal in our country. Our schools are breaking at the seams with the overcrowding of illegal immigrant's children, emergency rooms are backed up for hours before those who are sick or injured can be seen with the influx of illegal patients, doctors are delivering illegal immigrant babies by the thousands, and so forth, but the main point I'm trying to make is that this is but a small price to pay to enjoin the illegal vote on their side. With the consistent backing of 90% of all Afro Americans and about 95% of illegal Mexicans added to their left wing votes, the Democrats could potentially stay in office for a long time; that's all that matters.

President Bush just recently released his new and improved immigration policy that requires all illegal immigrants to return to Mexico, pay a ten thousand dollar fine and then wait in line to legally return to the US. Why even propose a plan with a 100% of failure? Who is giving this man advice?

First, I sympathize compassionately with the Mexicans migrating to our country to provide a better life for their families. Most Mexicans are hard working, caring people that should be given some realistic chance of becoming US citizens. How about illegals serving time in our military for a minimum of two to four years, helping us overseas where armed forces are needed or serving some type of community service to earn citizenship? How is is that I can think of this, but Congress can't?

Conversely, I'm increasingly despondent over the fact that the executive office, more specifically, President Bush, has refused to counter the Democrat's efforts to undue over 200 years of democracy. The Democrats have developed a new stratagem of not just demonizing their Congress counterparts as in the past, but are now attempting to criminalize those that disagree with their ideologies, take Scooter Libby as an example.

Scooter Libby successfully was entrapped by a liberal Federal attorney who indicted him for allegedly outing a CIA operative. They spent four years going after Scooter Libby, an aid to the Vice President in hopes of making a direct bee line to the president's head . Even after the prosecuting attorney found out that Libby was totally innocent of the original charge, he still went after him. They eventually found a jury to convict Libby on not being able to remember every single detail in hundreds of conversations over the last four years, therefore in their estimation, lying under oath. Libby can potentially serve 25 years in a Federal prison for a crime he didn't commit. Not one word out of Bush's mouth in his defense.

Now, they are going after the US Attorney General, Gonzalez in the same fashion. The president had the right to fire eight judicial judges, but the Democrat controlled Congress is indicting the Attorney General in hope of catching him in some type of lie under oath. It's a brilliant plan of action on the Democrat's twisted side worthy of the Nazi, Gerble himself. Mark my words, they will not quit there. Who will they go after next, you and I?

Bush's nugatory time remaining in office is consumed with his efforts of continuing his war in Iraq. I blame him for not standing up to these illiberal minded Democrats with the same intensity he defends the war. How about indicting Speaker of the House, Pelosi for meeting with the Syrians which is strictly forbidden by law. Your propitious attitude towards those who mean you serious harm, including jail time is quite disconcerting to me. In other words, Mr. President, it's time to stand up and fight for all of our causes, not just the war effort; our country's future depends on it.

Tuesday, March 6, 2007

Walter Reed Hospital Situation is a Fiasco

Walter Reed Fiasco

Another blow was dealt to the Bush's administration over the Walter Reed Hospital's mistreatment of US soldiers. The Walter Reed Veteran's Hospital is the shinning light of all military hospitals in the country and should be the ultimate in service for our wounded soldiers. Testimonials now coming to the forefront about the mistreatment of wounded and sick US soldiers at the hospital is quite disconcerting. It's difficult to believe it continued unchecked by anyone in a Republican administration.

It's just one more nail in the coffin for Republicans. Of course, this poor treatment of US soldiers at Walter Reed has probably been going on for years preceding the Bush administration, but you will never hear the media bring that up. Regardless of that, this should have never happened. Our brave military are already being paid below normal living standards and many are forced to live off food stamps. It's almost inconceivable to believe we have allowed it to get this bad. We don't even take care of our own. Shame on both parties. If this had happened in the Roman army two thousand years ago, there would have been an overthrow by one of the generals.

Bush needs to clean house. Heads need to roll. He needs to speak out and quit playing nice politics. Case in point, "I don't want to say anything that might hurt the lefts feelings."Of course the leaders on the left are incredibly vocal when it comes to bashing him calling him everything from a liar, coward, traitor to stupid. Be the frigging President. Stand up and take charge for God's sake.

I would like to see an investigation into how many anti-war personnel are working at the Veteran's hospital, purposely mistreating our brave soldiers. That investigation will never happen. Get rid of incompetents in all facets of the government. Republicans can't withstand another Katrina incident, but this has all the making of one. Bush can not stand idly by and allow this catastrophe to go on. Already, the left hates our military and only puts up a politically correct front in any glowing remarks about them.

Here's what I think Mr. President. If you can not take care of our own brave soldiers, those who sacrifice their lives for America, then you have no business attempting to take care of our nation. Step down or do the job the right way.

Friday, February 16, 2007

Leave the TV show, 24 alone!

I woke up this morning to hear on the radio that an army general has requested a meeting with the producers of the TV show, 24. It is my understanding that the general is going to attempt to influence the producers to modify the central character, Jack Baeur who heads up a CTU ant-terrorist group for the US government.

Here's what I think and a good bit of soul searching has gone into this observation. Mr. general, leave the f----g show alone and concentrate on what our tax paying citizens are paying you in the first place and that's for and that is for you to do your f---g job. Get back to Iraq and focus on the big picture, winning the war, keeping it from becoming a safe haven for terrorist.

Your contention, Mr. general is that the torture scenes on 24 are having an effect on your troops in Iraq and also that the show will destroy our image even more overseas. Let me explain the facts to you so that you will understand exactly what I'm saying. You have bowed into the left wing's peer pressure and now are attacking one of the few shows on TV with a remote right wing slant. 24 is a fictitious TV show and should not be taken too seriously by the government.

You are more concerned about how we will be perceived abroad than you are about our own children in America. How dare you, sir! You have no problem with 100,000 acts of violence being broadcast 24/7 on movies depicting zombies eating people's insides, heads being bashed in and exploded graphically, and a thousand other violent scenes influencing our own children. Who cares about them? We just don't want other nations to think poorly of us. Are you out of your cotton picking mind? The rest of the world hates us already and our US troops are routinely criticized by the drive by media for torturing prisoners. Yes, they did play Rap music which is offensive to Muslims, but no head were cut off as how our enemies treat our prisoners.

Leave 24 alone and go win the war you're paid to conduct and focus on protecting your own men and women in the military as much as you're concerned for our enemies.

Wednesday, February 14, 2007

Was the War in Iraq Beneficial to US Interest?

Was the war in Iraq beneficial to US interest is a valid question that can be better answered with the passing of time. It's too early to adequately judge the full long term ramifications of the US involvement in the middle east at this time.

One fact for sure it that the fanatical Muslims who attempt to spread their insane ideologies world wide only respect power and prey on countries that demonstrate weakness. The US was attacked on 9/11 and the connection at that time, even though the facts are suspect now with the advantage of hindsight, drew conclusions that there were valid reasons to get rid of Hussein and his fascist government. But one thing is abundantly clear, had we not gone into Iraq, 9/11 would be just one of the many ill fated dates in American history that future generations of history students would have to memorize.

Due to the strength demonstrated by President Bush after 9/11, love him or hate him, our country is much safer now than before. What country is fool enough to think America is weak ,as we were during the Iranian hostage crisis in the 80's under our worst president, Carter. The answer is none. Why? Because America will do whatever is necessary to protect itself.

Perhaps, we are not loved as before, but most countries hate the US anyway. America is a super power and must conduct itself as one. Being a super power has its responsibilities as well. It means the US should lead the world in financial aid and charity to those countries in need and America has done exactly that, but this fact is usually over looked.

But, one thing is clear to all, as long as America has a republican sitting in the White House, if America is attacked, god forbid, America will retaliate. This is basic survival 101 and all the left wing liberals that believe the Ossam's of this world only want peace and good will with us are as usual... dead wrong.

Is Charlize Theron anti-American?

Is Charlize Theron anti-American? She could be the most beautiful of the Hollywood beautiful and is respected as a fine actress as well. I know this because I'm one of her biggest fans up to now.

Lately, she has moved into the realm of politics. Her first venture into saving the world, or addressing the wrongs on our planet is revealed in her new exciting documentary on the hardships imposed on black Rappers in Cuba. Yes, you heard right.

Charlize is not speaking out on global warming or trying to raise funds for the aids crisis. No, her focus is all about how rapers in Cuba not being able to rap away into the night without the oppressed communistic government watching over their shoulders. God forbid, black rappers are not being able to... hold on a minute while I shed a tear... OK, I'm better now...not being able to rap freely.

This world startling documentary was make known on her appearance on CNN recently. Now for those who don't know what CNN stands for most of the time, it's so far to the left, that it's either called the Communist Channel or the Clinton Channel, not much difference between the two. It was during this interview that she claimed that America was a evil as Cuba. This took the CNN host back and even he had to readdress the issue. He asked her why she considered America as been the same as the despot controlled country of Cuba. She replied because America fires news reporters who are against the war on Iraq.

The reporter was shocked to say the least at her stupidy. He followed by asking her one more time if she considered America in the same vein as Cuba and again, she talked about the unjust war and replied a definite yes. Even the liberal host of the show was irritate and Charlize did everything in her power to change the subject. Her name sentence out of her political brain was, " I want to make out with you." What?

Apparently, her home country of South Africa, home of Apartheid is Ok by her political standards, but America is evil.

I've to remember never to listen to actors speak out on politics because most of the time, they reveal to the world how incredibly stupid they really are.

Wednesday, February 7, 2007

Al Gore's Nose is Growing Longer Each Day

Former Vice President, Al Gore has produced an award winning movie on Global Warming that has grabbed the world's attention. The first class produced film is unfortunately filled with enormous exaggerations according to most environmental scientist not associated with the EPR.
The problem is that those in control of these studies on global warming will not even accept, talk to, include in any discussions, or listen to any of those who don't agree with their findings.

The global warming fanatics have become a political entity with the goals of generating global funds keeping them solvent and also for continuing their stance against anything and everything associated with Republicans and especially, with President Bush. Their hatred for Bush is overwhelming with this group and truly believe that Bush by himself is responsible for global warming. Forget about China, Brazil, Russia and the rest of the world's contribution to pollutants on our planet; it's all Bush's fault.

After seeing the film, I've come to the conclusion that Gore is passionate, if nothing else about the issue of our earth heating up. The problem is that many of the sensational claims made in the movie are not considered factual by all learned scientist on this subject, but are presented as just that, facts.

Claims that Florida might disappear in the near future, that the oceans are going to increase by 20 feet, that blocks of ice found in Antarctica display a brown line (pollution) separating the exact date in the history of the world of course, when Gore himself enacted the Clean Air Act in Congress. Carbon Monoxide (Co2) is not a pollution as Gore claims.

I remember taking a geology class at USC where the professor claimed that California would be torn apart by earth quakes in the next ten years because of the state lying on a fault line. Of course I took this course in 1971 and California is still there just the like Florida will most likely still be there, if I continue to drive my SUV.

The scientist believe that the ocean level will be closer to a surge of 17 inches and not the 20 feet Gore claims. And the most egregious of all egoistical claims, his one environmental act changed the ice conditions around the world.

Here's one article I found online written by Eric Boehlert.

One month after formally kicking off his presidential campaign, Vice President Al Gore paddled down the Connecticut River in New Hampshire on July 22nd, 1999, spreading his green theme of protecting the environment and pausing for a photo op. His message was quickly drowned out, though, when the Washington Times' Bill Sammon reported that local authorities had granted Gore a special favor when they released nearly 4 billion gallons of water from a nearby dam into the drought-stricken river in order to keep the vice president's boat afloat.
The price tag on the spilled water was quickly calculated at $7 million. The implication was clear: In a clumsy abuse of power, Al Gore, a supposed friend of the environment, gladly wasted precious natural resources to stage-manage a political event.

Following the lead of the Washington Times, an unabashedly conservative outlet often hostile to Democrats, the rest of the mainstream press pounced, not only upbraiding Gore for his supposed hypocrisy but also suggesting that the campaign miscue was just the latest example of a foundering presidential run. The New York Times detailed the "mishap," the Washington Post ridiculed Gore's FOUR BILLION GALLONS FOR A PHOTO OP, Newsweek dubbed it the "photo op from hell," and CNN covered the "wave of criticism after floodgates are opened on a New Hampshire river to keep Al Gore afloat." This article was written by an angry Democrat upset at all the media press Gore was generating.

I say we give Gore the Nobel Peace Prize, but not for only his contributions against global warming, but for as he claims at inventing the Internet, and that he and his wife were the couple used as the inspiration for the movie, Love Story.

If Gore was Pinocchio, how long would his nose be?

Monday, February 5, 2007

Incredible Left Wing (Nut) Conspiracy Theories

Let's focus on Left Wing nut conspiracy theories today.

It's almost unbelievable the hatred the left has for President Bush. We can trace this beginning of this hatred back to last presidential election. This is where the left claimed that the vote count in Florida was rigged and Gore should have been elected president. Here's a suggestion for all of you that believe this; get over it!

Of course, Al Gore really believes this nonsense. As usual whenever the left wins in any state, they never contend that there could have been tampering with the voting machines, etc. It's only when they loose a state that they send in their pose of lawyers hopefully attempting to build a case against Republican so called corruption.

Al Gore even has a portion of his award winning film on Global Warming (that he'll surely win the Nobel Peace Prize for) dealing with not just the effects of global warming, but how he was cheated out of the presidency. What a despicable show of character on his part as well as the entire Democratic Party. Gore's film is mandatory for young school kids across America and I wonder how many young kids have already been brainwashed by this propaganda which is 100% full of lies.

Of course, our real president, Bush, is too nice to counter these instantiated accusations with the fire and brim stone rhetoric that must of us on the right would like to see from him. He simply doesn't play the game the same way the left plays, spewing lies, accusations, and vicious name calling, etc. Bush, at all times, rules with grace and dignity and yet, he's hated with such intensity that defies normal rational thinking.

Since the beginning of time, confused thinking individuals have conveniently bent, reconstructed the laws of rational thinking in an attempt to justify their biased views on subjects, no matter how ridiculous.

Bush is evil, therefore, he had to have been complicit in the entire undertaking of the attack on the World Towers on 9/11. How remarkably insane this theory is, but the most insane of all is the fact that the leading forces behind these ridiculous conspiracies are actually professors of universities and other scholarly fellows.

One of the conspiracy theories is that it's not possible that the metal beams could have been melted by the planes crashing into the towers. The intense heat generated by the crash could not have been entirely responsible for the end results.

Here's my own scientific research into this matter. A good bit of my time and effort went into my research. I discovered that I didn't invent the cause of what I believe actually happened; others for thousands of years have had the same insight. Here is it; Shit happens. Deal with it you crackpots. Your blind hatred of our president has turned your supposedly intellectual minds into the absurd.

I know what you're thinking. Bush also was seen swimming in the waters during the Katrina affair, personally setting the charges to blow up the levees in New Orleans. All this happened at the same time he was inventing the Holocaust in Germany in 1945.

In summation, keep up the good work and all of us on the right are holding our breath in anticipation of other brilliant theories.

Friday, February 2, 2007

Barack Obama has already changed colors... not "my momma says," but "Jessie Jackson says"...

What a shame!

I thought Barack Obama, the Democrat from Illinois who's running for president in 2008 was a clean, oh, I'm sorry for the Biden slip of tongue, I mean fresh, exciting, new face on the political scene. I personally have been given him the benefit of doubt and even writing positive articles about him up to now even though I'm a Republican. I honestly thought after listening to his rhetoric the last few months, that he was a voice that could unite both parties.

I couldn't have been more wrong. All I ask of a candidate is to be courageous in their convictions, do what they believe is right, act in the best interest of the country and not give in to peer pressures, lobbyist, etc.

Yesterday, Senator Biden, another Democrat running for president, misspoke as he was delivering a speech on his very first day after his announcement to run for our highest office. He was attempting to characterize his co-Democrat, Obama when he summed up Obama by including the words articulate and clean in his talk. All hell broke loose because these words could be taken offensive, if you're actually a retarded child from Borneo. Senator Biden of course meant no disrespect, he was actually praising the man, but of course the leaders of the Black Caucus, Al Sharpten and Jessie Jackson found this an opportune time to crucify Biden, (another evil white man) which they did.

When first hearing about Biden's remarks, smartly, Obama down played the remarks and laughed it off, saying it was a poor choice of words, but no big deal. Here's where Obama turned. Almost 10 minutes later after saying this, he receives his marching orders from Jackson and Sharpton and then delivered another, changed press conference basically echoing the words of his Black mentors to the word.

Here's some great advice for you, Obama. Next time someone asks you a question, answer it the same way Adam Sandler answered everyone in the movie, Waterboy. Instead of saying, "my momma says," just say, "Jackson says," before every answer since we now know who's pulling your strings every time your lips move.

Weak, gutless, spineless is how I see you now. You can bet your articulate, clean ass, that your actions yesterday clearly illustrated to all of us your true colors. We'll just have to wait for another bright young crusader to lead our country in the future because clearly, you are not it.

What a shame!

Thursday, February 1, 2007

Grandmother's 107th Birthday party

My wife and I just returned from attending my grandmother's (Assunta Vitali) birthday party in Philadelphia over the weekend. It was a glorious reunion of all of the family members gathered to pay RESPECT and show our love and admiration. She has 113 living descendants with more on their way.

It's quite extraordinary when you think about everything she has witnessed over her expansive life time; invention of the Model T cars, planes, TV, Radio, along with living through the depression, prohibiting, WW1, WW2, Korean War, Vietnam War, Persian Gulf War, and now the Iraq War.

To put it in better perspective, here's a list of 16 different presidents that have presided over our country during her life time and hopefully, she will add one more after next year's election. Woodrow Wilson, Warren Harding, Calvin Coolidge, Herbert Hoover, Franklin Roosevelt, Harry Truman, Dwight Eisenhower, John F Kennedy, Lyndon Johnson, Richard M Nixon, Gerald Ford, Jimmy Carter, Ronald Regan , George Bush, Bill Clinton, and George W. Bush .

Her husband, my grandfather passed away at the age of 104 and was no spring chicken himself at the time of his demise. In 1921 my grandfather, Bernado had been living in Philadelphia having immigrated from Italy two years earlier. I'm told that he was excited waiting for his beautiful bride to be, to arrive from Italy. He didn't know her, but as was the custom in Europe back then, the marriages were pre-arranged between the families. They loved each other their entire lives and produced five RESPECTFUL children who are all still alive and healthy today, one being my own dad, Joseph.

During the early immigration days in the 20's, every immigrant's goal was living the American dream in this great country of ours. One of the differences then compared to the immigrants of today is that back then, all children were encouraged to study and learn the English language. It was part of being RESPECTFUL as well as developing a major tool, (language) to work in America in order to survive.

Think about this: My grandparents didn't speak English when they arrived in America and only my grandfather picked up a few phrases over the 85 years he lived here. My grandmother still to this day only speaks Italian. Like all immigrants of that era moving to America, they lived in a area that was dominantly Italian (Little Italy) and didn't learn English.

But here's the irony. They didn't allow their five children to speak Italian in the household ever. So the children never spoke Italian and their parents never spoke English. They wanted the best for their children and made sure they would only speak English. Out of RESPECT, that's what the children did. You see, we are of Italian heritage where RESPECT is a major deal; respect for our families and respect for our country. That has been ingrained in all of the 113 descendants.

We live in a different world.

Nationalism was revered and emphasized during my grandparents day. Honoring their new country wasn't forced upon them or any of the millions of other immigrants from all different backgrounds, but gratefully done so out of respect for being able to live their dream.

On Friday, 15 of our family members visited Washington, DC taking in the historic sites. Washington reminds me a little of Rome with all the grand architecture displayed in our capital and all of us enjoyed our time there. While we were visiting the sites, the city was preparing for the anti-war or anti-Bush demonstrations that were going to be held the next day with Jane Fonda heading up the so called peace rally.

At the peace rally, a US wounded service men attempted to plead his nationalism, his pride for serving America in the Iraq war and even though he lost a leg, he respected Bush as well as our efforts in the war. The peace rally turned vicious on him. They called him names like, baby killer and yelled at him to go back to Iraq and kill more babies. They spit in his face, gave him the finger and a large portion of the crowd attempted to harm him physically until the police stepped between them. The peace loving crowd was in a uproar to do this American hero harm.

There are many reasons why times have changed so drastically over the last 100 years.
Nationalism has disappeared because of many factors.

Our educational system shares the blame to why we as citizens, no longer hold our country, the US in a positive light the same way our fathers once viewed our nation. Our tenured teachers, having to behold to no one to keep their jobs, slant our children in the direction that America is evil in every action the country takes in order to protect itself. Some universities have even gone as far as forbidding the flying of US flags on their campuses because it offends foreigners. Imagine this policy in any other country in the world.

Our history books no longer celebrate our history and its founders. George Washington is even looked down on because he kept slaves. This of course, to any rational person is insane, to judge our forefathers by today's standards. America at its height of slavery had less than 5% of the world slaves. In other words the entire world engaged in slavery. We don't condemn the entire world, just America, and more specifically, the south.

The media is also responsible for the decline of nationalism. The left wing, biased reporters search and destroy any political representatives that don't agree with their way of thinking. In a bygone era, Presidents' Jack Kennedy's indiscretions with multiple women were kept out of the press as were Martin Luther King's tendencies to bed two women at a time. The two men were heroes in America and were treated thus by the media; find faults if you could about what they represented, but keep their personal lives out of the public. Now, all hell has broken loose. Even Barak Obama is feeling the heat from Hillary's war camp about where he attended the 4th grade.

And lastly, Hollywood is also responsible for the decline of how our country is viewed worldwide and especially here in America. Name one pro-US film. It's quite difficult, isn't it? I believe I just read somewhere that Hollywood has produced 35 anti-America recently. The world judges us by our movies. Most of the world even attempts to learn the English language from our films. No wonder they think our CIA, FBI and gov't are corrupt.

We live in a different world.

Civil rights are held in higher esteem than one's human rights (the right to live). Hating your country and it's conservative leaders are a requirement if you are enlisted in the Left Party.There is universal celebrations throughout the Democratic party only when the country's economy is suffering or when Americans are being beheaded in Iraq. Anything that is negative in our country moves the left one inch closer to inserting in one of their own into the White House at any cost. Our government's ability to run covert wire surveillance from Muslim chatter abroad will now most likely be compromised by the left now that they control Congress.

Christians are considered the enemy in America to many on the left, while all Muslims, fanatical or not must be accepted on face value, no questions asked, or risk the likelihood of being condemned publicly.

We live in a different world.

Again, happy birthday, grandmother.

Tuesday, January 16, 2007

24 TV Show Analogy

What a wonderful first 4 hours kicking off this years 24 TV show. Keifer Sutherland is much more intense and seems to have the country's weight on his shoulder hunting down terrorist to save LA from a nuclear threat.

Once of the points the show is making is a direct correlation to what's happening in America today. The president's sister operates an agency for a Muslims center and when the FBI demand to acquire the files on Muslims within her data base, she deletes every file. She does this under the premise that the government is infringing on ordinary good Muslim's rights. Forget about the fact that bombs are going off all over the LA, people are dying, being blown up on trains, etc.,... the government know it's a Muslim group doing this, and yet, she contends that Muslims have civil rights that are more important that the LA citizen's basic human right to live.

Of course there are good and bad Muslims, but that's not the issue here. It's the right of every American to be safe in their own home. Try this for a mental excesses. Every time racial profiling is brought up in attempt to protect a few people's civil rights over the human rights of others, inject this premise.

Exchange the Muslim center seen on 24 for the KKK center instead. Would the president's sister still have been defending the rights of the racist KKK? Remember, the KKK as I hear today, kill no one, and only believe that whites are superior to all others races, including mine, Italian.

The worst they do now, is act stupidly burning crosses in Black's yards. They've kill no one in the last 30 years that I've heard of, or beheaded anyone, but normally keep to their racist selves. Yet, they are treated and viewed much more vile than any enemy Muslim that is out to kill every single American that isn't Muslim.

The president's sister on the 24 TV show would have led the way to hand over those files, kicking down the door herself, helping to lock up every KKK suspect for the slightest infraction and not one agency, including the ACLU would have spoken out or done anything to stop them. Instead, the president's sister would have been seen as a hero fighting for justice, blah, blah. I'm definitely not defending the KKK, but pointing out the hypocrisy's here.

All we have to do to defeat the terrorist is to think of them as the KKK. If that was the case, there would be no argument about listening in to phone calls coming in from suspected KKK freedom fighters intent on killing every non KKK Americans.

Racial profiling is not only the right thing to do, but what good police work is all about. We're living in a politically correct world that is now totally upside down.

Another Mental Exercise

This situation is that 4 Black churches have been burned down in one small town. Seen by many town folk, are KKK looking skin heads in each of the vicinities of each church that has been destroyed. Later a car carrying white skin heads is observed late at night moving slowly in a black neighborhood close to a black church. Should the police stop their car just as a precaution or instead ignore the car and begin stopping black grandmothers in wheel chairs and frisk them instead? What are we doing at our airports now?

Racial profiling was first celebrated by the author of Sherlock Holmes. He used elementary deductions to solve crimes. Why can't our police agencies do the same? If we, as a people can tolerate how we're all subjected to at airports, then we should be able to allow the government to spy / listen in on suspected terrorist chatter coming from overseas, etc.

Thursday, January 4, 2007


The Democrats took control of Congress today.

While the left side of the isle party and celebrate their re-take of what was once their house for the first time in 12 years, Republicans, Independents, and the everyday normal conservative thinking person are marking this day on their calendars as D-Day, the decline of America.

Of course, history will be written from some one's personal point of view, their own political slant on how they see things, but regardless of any future authors renditions, America on this day took that giant first step in their ultimate demise.

All good things must come to an end.

Remember the Roman empire, thousands of years of dominance and look what happened to them. Look how similar our country is to that once great empire; the Romans lose control of their central government, become dependent on their slave labor, bicker and fight among themselves, and without seeing the writing on the wall, lose it all almost overnight... entering into hundreds and hundreds years of the dark ages. We are not far off.

The Democratic suicidal concern for civil right of citizens is not what the Greeks and Romans had in mind when they were constructing the templates for future free thinking societies. Rights of citizens never, ever took precedence over national securities state of affairs. Imagine an enemy spy that represents the spy's country's intent on Rome's destruction and a Roman Senator stands up in the Assembly and decrees the spy's rights had been violated because of perhaps the means he was captured. The Senator crying for understanding and the release of this poor spy would be stabbed on the Senate floor. The ACLU would have lasted all of 15 minutes in those societies.

No one is attempting to deny Americans of civil rights granted to them by our constitution, but in time of war, exceptions must be made; like the kind Abraham Lincoln made when he imprisoned certain groups that were opposed to the Civil War.

When a person's civil rights out weighs my human rights, especially for the right to live safely on my own native soil, the writing is on the wall for eventual defeat.

Examples of note:

The Democrats are for destroying every effort for our military and intelligence to protect our citizens from attack from outside sources intent on destroying our nation. It doesn't matter that the fanatical Muslims are chattering on the Internet and phone lines to their secret coverts here in America about killing innocents in our country at every opportunity.

The Democratic party is more concerned about their rights to do whatever they have plans for without any type of surveillance from our government. Asking the NSA to first get warrants from judges that might take days to get in order to listen to enemy chatter is tantamount to insanity and criminal negligence.

Again, it's where you are seated as how you see any issue. Some understood why certain frontiersmen turned traitor in the French and Indians War. If you look at it from an Indian's perspective, they weren't traitors, but hero's. Of course most Americans looked upon such traitors as Simon Girty in the most despicable manner. He actually lead enemy Indians to settlers doors, and upon seeing a friendly face, the door opened up to hordes of Indians butchering, mutilating, scalping and burning at the stake all inside including infants. Girty also took part in the actual butchering of his fellow frontiers people.

It's the same with the left. The enemies threatening to destroy America will see the party in control, the Democrats as heroes as well, when America is no more; when cities have been nuked, Christians and Jews are being nailed to crosses, cut off heads of the women and infants litter the streets. These allies of those who would destroy us will be seen as heroes.

I guess it's just how to see it.

Tuesday, January 2, 2007


It's a new year, but more importantly, it's a new world.

News of Saddam Hussein's execution bodes well that Iraq can begin to rebuild their country now that their insane former dictator has now been hung.

But their are concerns over the war:

We are not fighting the war with a winning philosophy that must be brutal at times; thus the thousands years old cliche, war is hell. I agree the war had to be fought; American lives had to be sacrificed in a valiant effort in order to rid the world of a fanatical dictator fully capable of creating weapons of mass destruction. After the creation of such methods of destruction, Hussein would certainly use them against us and our allies.

Age and experience dictates that invading Iraq was the only solution and that the now known corrupt world alliance housed in Washington DC, the United Nations were in collusion with Hussein and that the US would have been bombed long before sanctions on Iraq would have ever been enforced.

The overall strategy of Bush is to create a new Iraq that will be democratic in nature that will have a positive versus negative impact in that fanatical Muslims controlled part of the world. Have said that, we should never act as occupiers, but should train the Iraq army to protect and control their own destiny. We are treating the Iraq people the same way we would spoil a child. We are not holding them accountable for the most basic of procedures; protecting their own people and running their own affairs.

And on top of that, we are spending up to one trillion dollars to rebuild their infrastructure and not one red cent is coming out of their pockets. Congress should act to override Bush's act of insane charity and to extract every cent spent in Iraq for our own uses in our own country.

What could our country do with one trillion dollars?

Think about this obsurdity. Most of our own military has to survive by living on food stamps, our schools assistance programs for breakfast and lunches have been cut back, music and basic exercise programs have been entirely deleted from schools and so forth, but we will pay for out of the taxpayers checking accounts rebuilding the entire country of Iraq. It's nice to know that they will have new schools, new hosipitals, new roads, etc. while we are forced to sacrifice here in our own country.

All this because Bush doesn't want to be perceived as going to war for oil. Who the fuck cares at the juncture? Have them repay the US gov't once they get back on their feet and their oil is flowing freely once again.