Al Gore's Nose is Growing Longer Each Day

Former Vice President, Al Gore has produced an award winning movie on Global Warming that has grabbed the world's attention. The first class produced film is unfortunately filled with enormous exaggerations according to most environmental scientist not associated with the EPR.
The problem is that those in control of these studies on global warming will not even accept, talk to, include in any discussions, or listen to any of those who don't agree with their findings.

The global warming fanatics have become a political entity with the goals of generating global funds keeping them solvent and also for continuing their stance against anything and everything associated with Republicans and especially, with President Bush. Their hatred for Bush is overwhelming with this group and truly believe that Bush by himself is responsible for global warming. Forget about China, Brazil, Russia and the rest of the world's contribution to pollutants on our planet; it's all Bush's fault.

After seeing the film, I've come to the conclusion that Gore is passionate, if nothing else about the issue of our earth heating up. The problem is that many of the sensational claims made in the movie are not considered factual by all learned scientist on this subject, but are presented as just that, facts.

Claims that Florida might disappear in the near future, that the oceans are going to increase by 20 feet, that blocks of ice found in Antarctica display a brown line (pollution) separating the exact date in the history of the world of course, when Gore himself enacted the Clean Air Act in Congress. Carbon Monoxide (Co2) is not a pollution as Gore claims.

I remember taking a geology class at USC where the professor claimed that California would be torn apart by earth quakes in the next ten years because of the state lying on a fault line. Of course I took this course in 1971 and California is still there just the like Florida will most likely still be there, if I continue to drive my SUV.

The scientist believe that the ocean level will be closer to a surge of 17 inches and not the 20 feet Gore claims. And the most egregious of all egoistical claims, his one environmental act changed the ice conditions around the world.

Here's one article I found online written by Eric Boehlert.

One month after formally kicking off his presidential campaign, Vice President Al Gore paddled down the Connecticut River in New Hampshire on July 22nd, 1999, spreading his green theme of protecting the environment and pausing for a photo op. His message was quickly drowned out, though, when the Washington Times' Bill Sammon reported that local authorities had granted Gore a special favor when they released nearly 4 billion gallons of water from a nearby dam into the drought-stricken river in order to keep the vice president's boat afloat.
The price tag on the spilled water was quickly calculated at $7 million. The implication was clear: In a clumsy abuse of power, Al Gore, a supposed friend of the environment, gladly wasted precious natural resources to stage-manage a political event.

Following the lead of the Washington Times, an unabashedly conservative outlet often hostile to Democrats, the rest of the mainstream press pounced, not only upbraiding Gore for his supposed hypocrisy but also suggesting that the campaign miscue was just the latest example of a foundering presidential run. The New York Times detailed the "mishap," the Washington Post ridiculed Gore's FOUR BILLION GALLONS FOR A PHOTO OP, Newsweek dubbed it the "photo op from hell," and CNN covered the "wave of criticism after floodgates are opened on a New Hampshire river to keep Al Gore afloat." This article was written by an angry Democrat upset at all the media press Gore was generating.

I say we give Gore the Nobel Peace Prize, but not for only his contributions against global warming, but for as he claims at inventing the Internet, and that he and his wife were the couple used as the inspiration for the movie, Love Story.

If Gore was Pinocchio, how long would his nose be?

Incredible Left Wing (Nut) Conspiracy Theories

Let's focus on Left Wing nut conspiracy theories today.

It's almost unbelievable the hatred the left has for President Bush. We can trace this beginning of this hatred back to last presidential election. This is where the left claimed that the vote count in Florida was rigged and Gore should have been elected president. Here's a suggestion for all of you that believe this; get over it!

Of course, Al Gore really believes this nonsense. As usual whenever the left wins in any state, they never contend that there could have been tampering with the voting machines, etc. It's only when they loose a state that they send in their pose of lawyers hopefully attempting to build a case against Republican so called corruption.

Al Gore even has a portion of his award winning film on Global Warming (that he'll surely win the Nobel Peace Prize for) dealing with not just the effects of global warming, but how he was cheated out of the presidency. What a despicable show of character on his part as well as the entire Democratic Party. Gore's film is mandatory for young school kids across America and I wonder how many young kids have already been brainwashed by this propaganda which is 100% full of lies.

Of course, our real president, Bush, is too nice to counter these instantiated accusations with the fire and brim stone rhetoric that must of us on the right would like to see from him. He simply doesn't play the game the same way the left plays, spewing lies, accusations, and vicious name calling, etc. Bush, at all times, rules with grace and dignity and yet, he's hated with such intensity that defies normal rational thinking.

Since the beginning of time, confused thinking individuals have conveniently bent, reconstructed the laws of rational thinking in an attempt to justify their biased views on subjects, no matter how ridiculous.

Bush is evil, therefore, he had to have been complicit in the entire undertaking of the attack on the World Towers on 9/11. How remarkably insane this theory is, but the most insane of all is the fact that the leading forces behind these ridiculous conspiracies are actually professors of universities and other scholarly fellows.

One of the conspiracy theories is that it's not possible that the metal beams could have been melted by the planes crashing into the towers. The intense heat generated by the crash could not have been entirely responsible for the end results.

Here's my own scientific research into this matter. A good bit of my time and effort went into my research. I discovered that I didn't invent the cause of what I believe actually happened; others for thousands of years have had the same insight. Here is it; Shit happens. Deal with it you crackpots. Your blind hatred of our president has turned your supposedly intellectual minds into the absurd.

I know what you're thinking. Bush also was seen swimming in the waters during the Katrina affair, personally setting the charges to blow up the levees in New Orleans. All this happened at the same time he was inventing the Holocaust in Germany in 1945.

In summation, keep up the good work and all of us on the right are holding our breath in anticipation of other brilliant theories.

Barack Obama has already changed colors... not "my momma says," but "Jessie Jackson says"...

What a shame!

I thought Barack Obama, the Democrat from Illinois who's running for president in 2008 was a clean, oh, I'm sorry for the Biden slip of tongue, I mean fresh, exciting, new face on the political scene. I personally have been given him the benefit of doubt and even writing positive articles about him up to now even though I'm a Republican. I honestly thought after listening to his rhetoric the last few months, that he was a voice that could unite both parties.

I couldn't have been more wrong. All I ask of a candidate is to be courageous in their convictions, do what they believe is right, act in the best interest of the country and not give in to peer pressures, lobbyist, etc.

Yesterday, Senator Biden, another Democrat running for president, misspoke as he was delivering a speech on his very first day after his announcement to run for our highest office. He was attempting to characterize his co-Democrat, Obama when he summed up Obama by including the words articulate and clean in his talk. All hell broke loose because these words could be taken offensive, if you're actually a retarded child from Borneo. Senator Biden of course meant no disrespect, he was actually praising the man, but of course the leaders of the Black Caucus, Al Sharpten and Jessie Jackson found this an opportune time to crucify Biden, (another evil white man) which they did.

When first hearing about Biden's remarks, smartly, Obama down played the remarks and laughed it off, saying it was a poor choice of words, but no big deal. Here's where Obama turned. Almost 10 minutes later after saying this, he receives his marching orders from Jackson and Sharpton and then delivered another, changed press conference basically echoing the words of his Black mentors to the word.

Here's some great advice for you, Obama. Next time someone asks you a question, answer it the same way Adam Sandler answered everyone in the movie, Waterboy. Instead of saying, "my momma says," just say, "Jackson says," before every answer since we now know who's pulling your strings every time your lips move.

Weak, gutless, spineless is how I see you now. You can bet your articulate, clean ass, that your actions yesterday clearly illustrated to all of us your true colors. We'll just have to wait for another bright young crusader to lead our country in the future because clearly, you are not it.

What a shame!

Grandmother's 107th Birthday party

My wife and I just returned from attending my grandmother's (Assunta Vitali) birthday party in Philadelphia over the weekend. It was a glorious reunion of all of the family members gathered to pay RESPECT and show our love and admiration. She has 113 living descendants with more on their way.

It's quite extraordinary when you think about everything she has witnessed over her expansive life time; invention of the Model T cars, planes, TV, Radio, along with living through the depression, prohibiting, WW1, WW2, Korean War, Vietnam War, Persian Gulf War, and now the Iraq War.

To put it in better perspective, here's a list of 16 different presidents that have presided over our country during her life time and hopefully, she will add one more after next year's election. Woodrow Wilson, Warren Harding, Calvin Coolidge, Herbert Hoover, Franklin Roosevelt, Harry Truman, Dwight Eisenhower, John F Kennedy, Lyndon Johnson, Richard M Nixon, Gerald Ford, Jimmy Carter, Ronald Regan , George Bush, Bill Clinton, and George W. Bush .

Her husband, my grandfather passed away at the age of 104 and was no spring chicken himself at the time of his demise. In 1921 my grandfather, Bernado had been living in Philadelphia having immigrated from Italy two years earlier. I'm told that he was excited waiting for his beautiful bride to be, to arrive from Italy. He didn't know her, but as was the custom in Europe back then, the marriages were pre-arranged between the families. They loved each other their entire lives and produced five RESPECTFUL children who are all still alive and healthy today, one being my own dad, Joseph.

During the early immigration days in the 20's, every immigrant's goal was living the American dream in this great country of ours. One of the differences then compared to the immigrants of today is that back then, all children were encouraged to study and learn the English language. It was part of being RESPECTFUL as well as developing a major tool, (language) to work in America in order to survive.

Think about this: My grandparents didn't speak English when they arrived in America and only my grandfather picked up a few phrases over the 85 years he lived here. My grandmother still to this day only speaks Italian. Like all immigrants of that era moving to America, they lived in a area that was dominantly Italian (Little Italy) and didn't learn English.

But here's the irony. They didn't allow their five children to speak Italian in the household ever. So the children never spoke Italian and their parents never spoke English. They wanted the best for their children and made sure they would only speak English. Out of RESPECT, that's what the children did. You see, we are of Italian heritage where RESPECT is a major deal; respect for our families and respect for our country. That has been ingrained in all of the 113 descendants.

We live in a different world.

Nationalism was revered and emphasized during my grandparents day. Honoring their new country wasn't forced upon them or any of the millions of other immigrants from all different backgrounds, but gratefully done so out of respect for being able to live their dream.

On Friday, 15 of our family members visited Washington, DC taking in the historic sites. Washington reminds me a little of Rome with all the grand architecture displayed in our capital and all of us enjoyed our time there. While we were visiting the sites, the city was preparing for the anti-war or anti-Bush demonstrations that were going to be held the next day with Jane Fonda heading up the so called peace rally.

At the peace rally, a US wounded service men attempted to plead his nationalism, his pride for serving America in the Iraq war and even though he lost a leg, he respected Bush as well as our efforts in the war. The peace rally turned vicious on him. They called him names like, baby killer and yelled at him to go back to Iraq and kill more babies. They spit in his face, gave him the finger and a large portion of the crowd attempted to harm him physically until the police stepped between them. The peace loving crowd was in a uproar to do this American hero harm.

There are many reasons why times have changed so drastically over the last 100 years.
Nationalism has disappeared because of many factors.

Our educational system shares the blame to why we as citizens, no longer hold our country, the US in a positive light the same way our fathers once viewed our nation. Our tenured teachers, having to behold to no one to keep their jobs, slant our children in the direction that America is evil in every action the country takes in order to protect itself. Some universities have even gone as far as forbidding the flying of US flags on their campuses because it offends foreigners. Imagine this policy in any other country in the world.

Our history books no longer celebrate our history and its founders. George Washington is even looked down on because he kept slaves. This of course, to any rational person is insane, to judge our forefathers by today's standards. America at its height of slavery had less than 5% of the world slaves. In other words the entire world engaged in slavery. We don't condemn the entire world, just America, and more specifically, the south.

The media is also responsible for the decline of nationalism. The left wing, biased reporters search and destroy any political representatives that don't agree with their way of thinking. In a bygone era, Presidents' Jack Kennedy's indiscretions with multiple women were kept out of the press as were Martin Luther King's tendencies to bed two women at a time. The two men were heroes in America and were treated thus by the media; find faults if you could about what they represented, but keep their personal lives out of the public. Now, all hell has broken loose. Even Barak Obama is feeling the heat from Hillary's war camp about where he attended the 4th grade.

And lastly, Hollywood is also responsible for the decline of how our country is viewed worldwide and especially here in America. Name one pro-US film. It's quite difficult, isn't it? I believe I just read somewhere that Hollywood has produced 35 anti-America recently. The world judges us by our movies. Most of the world even attempts to learn the English language from our films. No wonder they think our CIA, FBI and gov't are corrupt.

We live in a different world.

Civil rights are held in higher esteem than one's human rights (the right to live). Hating your country and it's conservative leaders are a requirement if you are enlisted in the Left Party.There is universal celebrations throughout the Democratic party only when the country's economy is suffering or when Americans are being beheaded in Iraq. Anything that is negative in our country moves the left one inch closer to inserting in one of their own into the White House at any cost. Our government's ability to run covert wire surveillance from Muslim chatter abroad will now most likely be compromised by the left now that they control Congress.

Christians are considered the enemy in America to many on the left, while all Muslims, fanatical or not must be accepted on face value, no questions asked, or risk the likelihood of being condemned publicly.

We live in a different world.

Again, happy birthday, grandmother.

24 TV Show Analogy

What a wonderful first 4 hours kicking off this years 24 TV show. Keifer Sutherland is much more intense and seems to have the country's weight on his shoulder hunting down terrorist to save LA from a nuclear threat.

Once of the points the show is making is a direct correlation to what's happening in America today. The president's sister operates an agency for a Muslims center and when the FBI demand to acquire the files on Muslims within her data base, she deletes every file. She does this under the premise that the government is infringing on ordinary good Muslim's rights. Forget about the fact that bombs are going off all over the LA, people are dying, being blown up on trains, etc.,... the government know it's a Muslim group doing this, and yet, she contends that Muslims have civil rights that are more important that the LA citizen's basic human right to live.

Of course there are good and bad Muslims, but that's not the issue here. It's the right of every American to be safe in their own home. Try this for a mental excesses. Every time racial profiling is brought up in attempt to protect a few people's civil rights over the human rights of others, inject this premise.

Exchange the Muslim center seen on 24 for the KKK center instead. Would the president's sister still have been defending the rights of the racist KKK? Remember, the KKK as I hear today, kill no one, and only believe that whites are superior to all others races, including mine, Italian.

The worst they do now, is act stupidly burning crosses in Black's yards. They've kill no one in the last 30 years that I've heard of, or beheaded anyone, but normally keep to their racist selves. Yet, they are treated and viewed much more vile than any enemy Muslim that is out to kill every single American that isn't Muslim.

The president's sister on the 24 TV show would have led the way to hand over those files, kicking down the door herself, helping to lock up every KKK suspect for the slightest infraction and not one agency, including the ACLU would have spoken out or done anything to stop them. Instead, the president's sister would have been seen as a hero fighting for justice, blah, blah. I'm definitely not defending the KKK, but pointing out the hypocrisy's here.

All we have to do to defeat the terrorist is to think of them as the KKK. If that was the case, there would be no argument about listening in to phone calls coming in from suspected KKK freedom fighters intent on killing every non KKK Americans.

Racial profiling is not only the right thing to do, but what good police work is all about. We're living in a politically correct world that is now totally upside down.

Another Mental Exercise

This situation is that 4 Black churches have been burned down in one small town. Seen by many town folk, are KKK looking skin heads in each of the vicinities of each church that has been destroyed. Later a car carrying white skin heads is observed late at night moving slowly in a black neighborhood close to a black church. Should the police stop their car just as a precaution or instead ignore the car and begin stopping black grandmothers in wheel chairs and frisk them instead? What are we doing at our airports now?

Racial profiling was first celebrated by the author of Sherlock Holmes. He used elementary deductions to solve crimes. Why can't our police agencies do the same? If we, as a people can tolerate how we're all subjected to at airports, then we should be able to allow the government to spy / listen in on suspected terrorist chatter coming from overseas, etc.

FIRST STEP TAKEN TODAY TOWARDS AMERICA'S DEMISE AS A GREAT SUPER POWER

The Democrats took control of Congress today.

While the left side of the isle party and celebrate their re-take of what was once their house for the first time in 12 years, Republicans, Independents, and the everyday normal conservative thinking person are marking this day on their calendars as D-Day, the decline of America.

Of course, history will be written from some one's personal point of view, their own political slant on how they see things, but regardless of any future authors renditions, America on this day took that giant first step in their ultimate demise.

All good things must come to an end.

Remember the Roman empire, thousands of years of dominance and look what happened to them. Look how similar our country is to that once great empire; the Romans lose control of their central government, become dependent on their slave labor, bicker and fight among themselves, and without seeing the writing on the wall, lose it all almost overnight... entering into hundreds and hundreds years of the dark ages. We are not far off.

The Democratic suicidal concern for civil right of citizens is not what the Greeks and Romans had in mind when they were constructing the templates for future free thinking societies. Rights of citizens never, ever took precedence over national securities state of affairs. Imagine an enemy spy that represents the spy's country's intent on Rome's destruction and a Roman Senator stands up in the Assembly and decrees the spy's rights had been violated because of perhaps the means he was captured. The Senator crying for understanding and the release of this poor spy would be stabbed on the Senate floor. The ACLU would have lasted all of 15 minutes in those societies.

No one is attempting to deny Americans of civil rights granted to them by our constitution, but in time of war, exceptions must be made; like the kind Abraham Lincoln made when he imprisoned certain groups that were opposed to the Civil War.


When a person's civil rights out weighs my human rights, especially for the right to live safely on my own native soil, the writing is on the wall for eventual defeat.

Examples of note:

The Democrats are for destroying every effort for our military and intelligence to protect our citizens from attack from outside sources intent on destroying our nation. It doesn't matter that the fanatical Muslims are chattering on the Internet and phone lines to their secret coverts here in America about killing innocents in our country at every opportunity.

The Democratic party is more concerned about their rights to do whatever they have plans for without any type of surveillance from our government. Asking the NSA to first get warrants from judges that might take days to get in order to listen to enemy chatter is tantamount to insanity and criminal negligence.

Again, it's where you are seated as how you see any issue. Some understood why certain frontiersmen turned traitor in the French and Indians War. If you look at it from an Indian's perspective, they weren't traitors, but hero's. Of course most Americans looked upon such traitors as Simon Girty in the most despicable manner. He actually lead enemy Indians to settlers doors, and upon seeing a friendly face, the door opened up to hordes of Indians butchering, mutilating, scalping and burning at the stake all inside including infants. Girty also took part in the actual butchering of his fellow frontiers people.

It's the same with the left. The enemies threatening to destroy America will see the party in control, the Democrats as heroes as well, when America is no more; when cities have been nuked, Christians and Jews are being nailed to crosses, cut off heads of the women and infants litter the streets. These allies of those who would destroy us will be seen as heroes.

I guess it's just how to see it.

IT''S A NEW WORLD

It's a new year, but more importantly, it's a new world.

News of Saddam Hussein's execution bodes well that Iraq can begin to rebuild their country now that their insane former dictator has now been hung.

But their are concerns over the war:

We are not fighting the war with a winning philosophy that must be brutal at times; thus the thousands years old cliche, war is hell. I agree the war had to be fought; American lives had to be sacrificed in a valiant effort in order to rid the world of a fanatical dictator fully capable of creating weapons of mass destruction. After the creation of such methods of destruction, Hussein would certainly use them against us and our allies.

Age and experience dictates that invading Iraq was the only solution and that the now known corrupt world alliance housed in Washington DC, the United Nations were in collusion with Hussein and that the US would have been bombed long before sanctions on Iraq would have ever been enforced.

The overall strategy of Bush is to create a new Iraq that will be democratic in nature that will have a positive versus negative impact in that fanatical Muslims controlled part of the world. Have said that, we should never act as occupiers, but should train the Iraq army to protect and control their own destiny. We are treating the Iraq people the same way we would spoil a child. We are not holding them accountable for the most basic of procedures; protecting their own people and running their own affairs.

And on top of that, we are spending up to one trillion dollars to rebuild their infrastructure and not one red cent is coming out of their pockets. Congress should act to override Bush's act of insane charity and to extract every cent spent in Iraq for our own uses in our own country.

What could our country do with one trillion dollars?

Think about this obsurdity. Most of our own military has to survive by living on food stamps, our schools assistance programs for breakfast and lunches have been cut back, music and basic exercise programs have been entirely deleted from schools and so forth, but we will pay for out of the taxpayers checking accounts rebuilding the entire country of Iraq. It's nice to know that they will have new schools, new hosipitals, new roads, etc. while we are forced to sacrifice here in our own country.

All this because Bush doesn't want to be perceived as going to war for oil. Who the fuck cares at the juncture? Have them repay the US gov't once they get back on their feet and their oil is flowing freely once again.


Bye